Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 3,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 9:18 am by Alexandra Allan
All other terms were stated to be subject to the Sellers’ standard contract, with terms not indicated to be mutually agreed after negotiation. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am by Timothy Powers O'Neill
State contract law, however, is the ultimate arbiter of whether a contract actually “obligates” a seller to erect a building within two years. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
It should be born in mind that in L’Oréal v eBay the CJEU stated 3 things: “The fact that the service provided by the operator of an online marketplace includes the storage of information transmitted to it by its customer-sellers is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that that service falls, in all situations, within the scope of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31” (at [113]). [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 8:48 am by Josh Wright
Under this initiative, there is not going to be anything in place state run. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:03 pm by Aaron Rubin
Jones III of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted the Trustee-Defendant Wilmington Trust Company’s (“Wilmington Trust”) motion to dismiss in IKB International, S.A. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]