Search for: "Smith v. Gaines"
Results 681 - 700
of 815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 7:24 am
The court did not consider the “illegality” argument which had been put forward by the Council at first instance, namely that because Mr Smith’s occupation of his property was illegal, he could not thereby gain adverse possession of it. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:36 pm
Bank v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am
(AP / Times-Picayune / Lambda Legal press release) The case is Adar v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
But even in criminal proceedings account must be taken of the article 8 rights of the perceived victim: see SN v Sweden, App no 34209/96, 2 July 2002. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
Aftermath of Brane v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:52 pm
The gain to the individual actor is a measure of the social gain from his action.There are some cases which look very similar but are actually quite different—where the link between what it pays an actor to do and the benefit his action produces is in some sense an accident.One example is speculation. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Based on the New York Convention of 1958, arbitration has been accepted almost worldwide as a valuable alternative to litigation.6 At present, the trend towards liberalisation of arbitration and towards empowerment of arbitral tribunals continues to gain acceptance – denoted by the keywords of kompetenz-kompetenz of the arbitral tribunal and of the delocalisation of arbitral awards.7 This concept is aimed at detaching arbitration as an autonomous system of dispute resolution entirely… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:01 am
Smith. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Editor’s Note: Eduardo Gallardo is a partner focusing on mergers and acquisitions at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:02 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:43 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme court, in Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:28 pm
Iqbal: The Fourth Circuit's Decision In Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
