Search for: "Sonia Stephens"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,943
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 2:25 pm
He immediately faced tough questions from Justice Sonia Sotomayor about whether his client had standing to challenge the decision. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 11:59 am
Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer were the only justices to vote against him more often than they voted for him. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:27 am
As Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Sawchak, “What makes it your right under any circumstance to tax all of the trust income where there’s no guarantee that she is going to receive all of it at any point? [read post]
Argument analysis: Spinning heads and swimming constitutional rights in debates over an accrual rule
18 Apr 2019, 8:11 am
” O’Connor declined to dispute that, prompting Justice Sonia Sotomayor to suggest that each use of fabricated evidence until acquittal constitutes “either a continuing violation or a finishing of the accrual time. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm
Perhaps the most significant moment in Michael’s argument was his brief answer to a factual question from Justice Stephen Breyer asking what percentage of OCSLA cases arise in the 5th Circuit. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
Alito and Justice Sonia Sotomayor pushed back on the first rationale, pointing out that trademarks can be used in commerce whether or not they are registered, and that rejecting a trademark registration does not remove it from the stream of commerce. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:55 am
That brought a sharp retort from Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Aren’t we rewarding you for not raising it adequately below, rewarding you for mentioning it in two sentences in your cert petition and not asking us to take it as a separate question presented? [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:57 am
Justices Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor wrote dissenting opinions; they were joined in dissent by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 10:42 am
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined in Breyer’s dissent. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:39 am
Justice Stephen Breyer filed a lengthy and often biting dissent from the order, which was joined by all three of his liberal colleagues: Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
At both ends of the spectrum, he voted on the opposite side from liberal Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor eight times, and he was only once on the opposite side of a vote from Thomas. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 2:15 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer had the main dissent, which was joined in large part by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:03 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:24 am
Justice Elena Kagan dissented in that case along with Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, but the court seems open to addressing the issue in this case assuming that Texas refuses to comply. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:07 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer seemed to believe that federal agencies, rather than federal judges, have expertise in their specific subject matter that makes them better suited to interpret highly technical regulations. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:06 am
Waxman did not get far into his argument — 41 words to be exact — before he was interrupted by a barrage of statements from Justice Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested the Hobbs Act plainly strips jurisdiction from district courts to look beyond the FCC’s order and questioned why PDR Network wasn’t challenging the constitutionality of the Hobbs Act. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
The Court’s four more liberal members – Justices Stephen G. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 8:17 am
Indeed, the most notable thing about this case is probably Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s concurrence. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer’s plurality opinion, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, holds that an 1855 treaty guaranteeing the Yakama “the right, in common with citizens of the United States, to travel upon all public highways,” pre-empts a tax triggered when motor fuel “enters into [Washington] state. [read post]
