Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 5:45 am
Compared to the previous version, that draft is a step in the right direction with respect to injunctive relief, though at the current pace it would take Europe about 20 years to catch up with the U.S. eBay v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:11 am
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
The Convention also forbade States parties from conferring such immunities from (severe) criticism on their own (republican) heads of State (Artun and Güvener v Turkey, para 31; Pakdemirli v Turkey, paras 52 et seq). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
This case will not spell the end of pro-life incrementalism; far from it. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the state of Illinois in Madigan v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:35 pm
The case is L.W. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:51 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has now given judgment in Case C-117/13Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:36 am
The campaign to overrule Auer got its initial impetus from a series of individual opinions written by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, spelled out most fully in Decker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:42 pm
" That phrase came to mind when reading CGCCA's opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 9:52 am
Van Buren v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 2:54 pm
Krasno v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:05 am
After Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:01 pm
The “24 month rule” set forth in Fifield v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 15, 2008 Batterman v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:47 pm
” Teleflex, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
While we are discussing corruption in India, it may be interesting to look at the recent decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in Glenister v President of the Republic of SA [2011] ZACC 6, drawing a duty to effectively tackle corruption from the duty to respect constitutional rights. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 9:20 am
As previously written about on this blog, the case PhoneDog v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:30 am
Oral argument Tuesday afternoon in United States v. [read post]
