Search for: "Spencer v Spencer"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:27 am
AETN had been granted permission to conduct witness-gathering evidence before the ruling in Marks & Spencer Plc v Interflora Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here], which requires the court, at an interim stage, to conduct a critical analysis of whether such evidence will be valuable to a determination of the issues and justifies the costs involved. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Frank Johns, Catherine Seal, Spencer Crona, Mary Joy Quinn, Howard S. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:20 pm
Spencer (prisoner rights, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)* State Courts Bulletin Cases featured:In re Morris (Indian Child Welfare Act, notice) In re D.L and K.L. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:12 pm
In Speedemissions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:12 pm
In Speedemissions, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Spencer, 2013 U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:57 am
In his recent decision in the Pennsylvania Federal Middle District case of Vaskas v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm
See Spencer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm
See Spencer v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:26 am
That case is Glasser & Glasser v Jack Bays, Inc et al. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:34 pm
The Eastern District decision in Kordek v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am
The best way that David Cameron could protect the severely disabled is to drop its appeal to the Supreme Court and amend the Regulations accordingly.Mike Spencer Legal Officer, Child Poverty Action Group(1) Reg 5 HB (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (SI No.3040), which inserts new regs 12BA, A13 and B13 into the HB Regulations 2006 (2) Burnip, Trengove, Gorry v SSWP [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (3) DWP, under Regulation 11(2)(b) of the Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit… [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am
The best way that David Cameron could protect the severely disabled is to drop its appeal to the Supreme Court and amend the Regulations accordingly.Mike Spencer Legal Officer, Child Poverty Action Group(1) Reg 5 HB (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (SI No.3040), which inserts new regs 12BA, A13 and B13 into the HB Regulations 2006 (2) Burnip, Trengove, Gorry v SSWP [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (3) DWP, under Regulation 11(2)(b) of the Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Spencer respond to questions from the Chief Justice during last week’s oral arguments in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm
” As Wells posted earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Clapper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:20 am
The following contribution to our Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Robert then tackled Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, in which the CJEU viewed the impression of the average internet user as being an essential element of the test of whether the use of another's brand as a keyword conveys an impression that the use of that brand suggests that the user's business is connected with that of the brand owner. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:16 pm
Spencer, 2012 Mass. [read post]
