Search for: "Stake v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,995
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:44 am
Accordingly, although the United States may have a regulatory interest in the E-Rate program, the United States does not have a financial stake in its fraudulent losses. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:36 am
I refer to a classic contract law case, Odorizzi v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:59 am
The Eleventh Circuit noted that four justices of the United States Supreme Court – the only four who have weighed in on the issue – adopted the same analysis in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:39 pm
Posted by Greg MersolToday the United States Supreme Court delivered an unexpected present to employers facing FLSA collective actions and held that a defendant may moot such a case by making a Rule 68 offer of judgment to the named plaintiff. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:30 am
That is how a judge lives in a state of trust, and I know of no other way to make good on the aspirations that tell us who we are, and who we mean to be, as the people of the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:34 am
The court also rejects the idea that the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
In the United States, you have the right to an attorney – even if you cannot afford one. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:40 am
Veronica V., a mother of three U.S. citizen children who lived in the United States for almost 20 years before her expulsion, was arrested by ICE just beyond the border and coerced into accepting "voluntary" return. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) was enacted by Congress and signed into law in 1970 as a tool to combat organized crime in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Not an "Offense" to Violate Supervised Release in the Ninth - Jensen and Sec. 3146
21 Jan 2013, 5:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:51 pm
United States:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-complaint For more on FOSTA:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/how-congress-censored-internet Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
Unlike the narrow and low-stakes issue discussed the first hour of the day (in Harris v. [read post]
18 Mar 2006, 1:48 am
In Evans v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 7:47 am
United States, 505 U. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 11:42 am
[Noem v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:33 am
The justices initially wanted Wall to explain how the government could reconcile its position in this case with its earlier position in United States v. [read post]
