Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 681 - 700
of 4,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
Superior Court (2012) 2012 Cal. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
Superior Court (2012) 2012 Cal. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
Yesterday, a California superior court judge dismissed pimping charge (due to Section 230) but did not dismiss money laundering charges against three Backpage executives. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:25 am
Curiously, the Court takes on a ruling in 2008 by another panel of the Superior Court in Billhime v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:24 am
Superior Court of California would extend to federal class actions. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:19 pm
The issue decided by the California Supreme Court in Arias v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
Largent Today a California court issued the first published state court decision addressing whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v Concepcion invalidates the California Supreme Court's decision in Gentry v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:55 am
So we were interested to see a state appeals court decision in favor of Countrywide coming out of Riverside Superior Court. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:49 pm
A recent California Court of Appeal decision held that the receipt, retention and dissemination of confidential information by a whistleblower’s attorney is protected by the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
Superior Court, No. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
The Superior Court sided with the city, and when Pack appealed, the California Court of Appeal ruled that the local ordinance was preempted by federal law, namely the Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
Superior Court that a PAGA plaintiff need not have a class certified to proceed. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
Otsuka v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 11:04 am
Superior Court, 38 P.3d 512 (Cal. 2002). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Interestingly, in its introduction, the Court stated: "We hold the provision is unconscionable and unenforceable under Armendariz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
A California Superior Court’s recent ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
Thus, for an example from a court case (in a state, California, where citation sentences are often put in parentheses), A two-step analysis is required when the superior court is requested to rule on a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statutory framework. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Heckman issued a tentative decision on November 2, 2020 following a court trial in Gallagher et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Heckman issued a tentative decision on November 2, 2020 following a court trial in Gallagher et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:52 am
Superior Court, No. [read post]
