Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 2:23 am
The United States Supreme Court has granted Certiorari in the case of Gamble v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
As of today, nothing has been filed on behalf of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:46 am
United States urging the Supreme Court to end the exception for good. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 12:00 pm
United States 18-234 Issue: Whether, and to what extent, the discretionary-function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
Chemerinsky opina sobre consecuencias de nombramiento de Brett Kavanaugh al Tribunal Supremo federal
3 Sep 2018, 7:25 am
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:59 am
’” The Second Circuit Court of Appeals on August 20, 2018 reinforced this recognition by remanding a guilty plea conviction in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
United States instructive. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:32 am
In 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Navarette v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:55 am
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Health Care Costs – Veterans) United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Health Care Costs - Veterans) United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:56 am
United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 2:18 pm
To read the Texas lawsuit, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
According to SCOTUS Watch, which “tracks the public statements made by United States senators about how they plan to vote,” 31 Republicans are “likely yes” and 16 (including McCain) are “definitely yes” on the confirmation. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
Money transmitter regulation in the U.S. is separate from federal money services business registration, and is governed on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:24 am
Notable Events of the Week: “President Trump stood next to President Vladimir V. [read post]
