Search for: "State v Reed"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at the ransomware phenomenon, how companies are responding, and why. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
Most important however was his stand on Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
” Dissent in Murdock v Pennsylvania Justice Reed authored a dissent, in which Justices Frankfurter, Jackson, and Roberts joined. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00446.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in New York State served disciplinary charges [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00446.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in New York State served disciplinary charges [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Krstić and a “turning point” appellate ruling in Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am
However, following judgment in the earlier Supreme Court case R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, the view taken again was that the UK Act effectively trumped the Scottish Bill, while it awaited the outcome of this constitutional challenge. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Witness Hamdan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
Paul Reed Smith Guitars, LP, 423 F.3d 539, 549 (6th Cir. 2005). [read post]
