Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 681 - 700
of 24,597
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
A defendant bears the initial burden of establishing that he or she has been released from any claims (see Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., 17 NY3d 269, 276). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:33 am
In Groff v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
See, e.g., Paul v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:10 am
In Kravitz v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:05 pm
Albright v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:26 am
Sources: Complaint at 32, Borné et. al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
For example, in Rosalba Alassini v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am
Finally, Roche further attached a resolution from FICPI (the International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys), which outlines the danger and burden to applicants of the EPO's description amendment requirement. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm
Concurrence: And what's all this about requiring a "substantial" burden on religion to state a claim; we usually don't let courts decide how important someone's religious practice is. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
In Rubio v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:04 am
Therefore, the original complaint failed to state a cause of action for fraud” Ault v. [read post]