Search for: "State v. Cross"
Results 681 - 700
of 14,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 1:01 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
In Noe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm
Cody Tuma the stated that his ability to lie has changed since is religious experience. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
Each of these defendants filed a motion to cross-examine the State's experts listing eight areas of concern about the internal workings of the Intoxilyzer 5000. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
§ 3742 confer authority to correct a legal error absent a cross-appeal, particularly for "sentencing errors that the Government refrained from pursuing," and noted that the strict time limits on notices of appeal and cross-appeal would be undermined if an appeals court could modify the judgment in favor of a party who had filed no notice of appeal. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:38 pm
Reversing BNSF's conviction on grounds of federal preemption.Those pesky states. [read post]
31 May 2009, 5:48 am
NFL Players Association v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:33 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
The Motion and Memorandum in Support (full text) in Cross v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:04 pm
It is also asked to reverse American National Red Cross v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:09 am
The Second Circuit as a matter of first impression, considered whether the bar on extraterritorial application of the United States securities laws, as set forth in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Summary of Decision issued December 17, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Cross v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Judgment reserved. 16:06: Re the cross-appeal – the Judges in the Court below were correct to conclude that the cross-appeal had been properly dealt with by the letter the Government sent. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 7:59 am
Reed v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 10:57 pm
In LVCVA v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
