Search for: "State v. David O."
Results 681 - 700
of 2,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
See, e.g., DeHart v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
See, e.g., DeHart v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sanders and Reynolds v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
United States and Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
There’s no way I can get the “scoop” on what has been perhaps the most eagerly awaited Supreme Court decision of the term: Ricci v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:30 pm
Finstuen v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:04 pm
State, 2010 WL 537641(N.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 6 November 2023, there was a statement in open court in the case of Packham v Fieldsports Channel & O’Rourke KB-2023-000965. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm
David M. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
O'Malley, 42 F. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
And the Associated Press (via Arizona Capitol Times) reports on a speech by Justice O’Connor in Arizona for the launch of a nonpartisan initiative aimed at increasing voter registration in that state. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:51 am
David O Markus's business and blog. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 3:34 pm
by David Hricik Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:02 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
And 10,000 more are coming…* CJEU on taser, ahm, tacit prorogation of jurisdictionMark pens of Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others (Case C-175/15), a decision where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed the issue of whether Article 24 of Brussels I Regulation applies in cases where one party is domiciled in a non-EU Member State. * Two Book Reviews: European Law Design and The Changing European PatentDavid reviews another… [read post]
