Search for: "State v. House"
Results 681 - 700
of 28,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2014, 11:20 am
Post, May 15, 2014Emily Badger, Housing Segregation Is Holding Back the Promise of Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
GPC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:21 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
”So are you rooting for House Pizzi or House Slaton? [read post]
New Judgment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
26 Jul 2017, 2:39 am
To determine the initial criterion, the Supreme Court held that the burden of proof of establishing that the proposed marriage is one of convenience falls on the Secretary of State. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:01 pm
Remember Mike Ritze, the Oklahoma bozo who filed the "Ten Commandments Monument Display Act," in the Oklahoma House of Representatives seeking to have a monument of the Ten Commandments placed on the state Capitol grounds? [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:00 pm
Stewart, No. 09-0257 (docket and briefs) (a takings case involving the City’s demolition of a house determined to be a nuisance) and Jefferson State Bank v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
This was an important case, building upon some earlier cases, like United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:55 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action [2009] UKHL 28 (10 June 2009) Hanoman (FC) (Respondent) v London Borough of Southwark (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 29 (10 June 2009) R v Islam (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) [2009] UKHL 30 [...] [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:06 am
The Supreme Court recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:11 am
The competition authorities of individual EU Member States will still apply their national rules on LPP, which may recognize communications with in-house counsel as privileged. [read post]
