Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Beydoun, Electing Islamophobia, (March 6, 2016).Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, Fragmented Oversight of Nonprofits in the United States: Does it Work? [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am
Jacob Schulz posted a ruling from the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:55 am
Yesterday morning the Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
Justice Kagan questioned whether the state court opinions had failed to follow Mathis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 12:07 pm
Valdosta State Univ. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:06 pm
Roach v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:06 pm
Roach v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:26 am
See Rabbi Jacob Joseph Sch. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
Jacobs of Greenwire, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Walden Macht & Haran LLP, New York (Jacob S. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Walden Macht & Haran LLP, New York (Jacob S. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:51 am
Jacobs of Greenwire, who also notes that the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
" (Sinrod v Stone, 20 AD3d 560, 561 [2d Dept 2005]; Mosesson v Jacob D. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:01 am
However, as the court noted, this argument did not succeed because the trial court had issued a final order stating that Jacob would not longer be party to the proceedings, and neither party appealed that order dismissing Jacob’s appeal. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:40 pm
The traditional common law position, represented by cases such as National Trust v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
