Search for: "State v. K. P."
Results 681 - 700
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2011, 1:20 pm
In the case of Ken Watts v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property, (in Relevance of… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Johnny P. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
Smith and David K. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
” (Snyder v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 8:18 pm
December 11, 1997 97-R-1451TO: FROM: Lawrence K. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
As explained in the April Order, plaintiffs allocution defeats any claim that she misunderstood its terms, and therefore, defendants’ actions could not have caused her damages (see Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am
Gonda and Amanda K. [read post]
15 May 2007, 11:16 am
Donna K. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:53 pm
Connie Erck (NFP) Dennis P. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:49 pm
Vasilakos and Debbie K. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Combining these two and stating that G 2/10 has added criteria to G 1/03 does not sound right to me. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
See Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428, 429 (1st Dept 2015) (affirming dismissal of malpractice claim based on “allegations ‘couched in terms of gross speculations on future events”‘), quoting Sherwood Group, Inc. v Dornbush, Mensch, Mandelstam & Silverman, 191 AD2d 292, 294 (1st Dept 1993 ); Leff v Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, 78 AD3d 531, 533 (I st Dept 2010) (“[P]laintiff cannot… [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
As we have already mentioned, on Tuesday 23 October 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Underhill V-P and Henderson LJ) handed down judgment in ABC v Telegraph Media Group [2018] EWCA Civ 2329. [read post]
