Search for: "State v. Keen"
Results 681 - 700
of 917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
In doing so, it has followed another recent English case in Dhanani v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:31 am
Wolff’s keen dissent (to which Teitleman joined) in Kansas City Premier Apartments, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm
The surveillance aspects to these orders follow the precedent set in Howlett v Holding [2006] EWHC 41 (QB) where Eady J stated: Holding has revealed that he has had Mrs Howlett watched at various times and wishes to retain his right to do so, whatever anxiety and distress that may cause her [16]. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:13 pm
Supreme Court’s decision next term in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm
I hope that John Pollock’s optimism in that regard proves true, but with many states facing the bleakest fiscal outlook on record, advocates must turn a keen eye to ensuring that Turner does not signal a retreat from existing rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:29 am
The email stated that [Branson] and Keene were speaking in front of Mitch Pate, a pit manager, about the performance of [their] subordinates. . . . [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
The following is a guest post from Anita Krishankumar: Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Sykes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:09 pm
Nor do I believe in the continuing viability of the constitutional compact-based justification for judicial review first offered up by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:25 pm
The case was Stokes v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:02 pm
" This is also made clear in the 1988, Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm
In his 1989 dissent, as now, Stevens appeared to be motivated, at least in part, by his keen sense of patriotism, enhanced by his service in the U.S. military in World War II. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:19 am
Jed Graham, writing at Investor Business Daily's Capital Hill blog, makes this keen observation:"[V]irtually no one understands what the law means or how premium subsidies will grow over time — and it’s a near certainty that the confusion extends to the members of Congress who voted for it. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:10 pm
., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:40 pm
" Heskin v. [read post]
