Search for: "State v. Leon" Results 681 - 700 of 1,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am by Alex R. McQuade
Daniel Byman analyzed the Islamic State’s archipelago and examines the pseudo-state’s many provinces. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the complaint herein sufficiently alleges a cause of action in negligence against the SLS defendants and the SLS employees (see Rivera v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 191 F Supp 2d at 421; see also Williams v State of New York, 84 AD3d 412). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:14 pm by Juan Antunez
Hearn, 17 So.3d 745, 747 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Leon Shaffer Golnick Adver., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
The sand spit that Juan Ponce de Leon baptized La Florida was no exception. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
  The relevant briefs and memoranda are: The Sept. 24, 1973, OLC Dixon memo The Oct. 5, 1973, brief for the United States in In re Agnew The Feb. 12, 1974, memorandum to Independent Counsel Leon Jaworski The June 21, 1974, reply brief for the United States in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the complaint a liberal construction, accept all facts as alleged in the complaint to be true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by James Bickford
A post at ACSblog suggests that Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR [*2]3211(a)(7), the sole criterion is whether the pleading states a cause of action, and if from its four corners factual allegations are discerned which taken together manifest any cause of action cognizable at law[,] a motion for dismissal will fail'" (Kopelowitz & Co., Inc. v Mann, 83 AD3d 793, 796, quoting Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; see… [read post]