Search for: "State v. Little Bear" Results 681 - 700 of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Ashton
This is the latest chapter in a series of cases that began with New York State Rifle Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:16 am by Karwan Eskerie
” Reference was then made to the case law establishing the following: (a)    “[V]ery frequently words and behaviour with which police officers will be wearily familiar will have little emotional impact on them save that of boredom” (per Glidewell LJ,  DPP v Orum [1989] Cr App Rep 261). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
Both opinions, like Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Sarah F. Corning
The opinion is little more than a page ripped from the anti-abortion playbook—and bears little resemblance to a judicial opinion. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
Statisticians amongst you will be delighted to hear that the page count is 34 and the paragraph count a little under 120. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
That simple and logical proposition was too much for this panel to bear, however, because of the societal “value” it perceived in the information at stake (i.e., tracing immigrants). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
  A few caveats bear mention. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
He did not have any prior record, but had little savings and no assets. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
Nor is there anything else in the Stevens papers that bears on this question. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am by Susan Brenner
On March 5, 2012, Burgos filed a motion asking the judge to reconsider the ruling in “light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in” U.S. v. [read post]