Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 681 - 700 of 21,522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
***See alsoOf the appealed Georgia-Pacific case-->Georgia-pacific Corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
March 27th marked six months in the United States without an execution. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm by Giorgio Luceri
The Court stated that the acts of advertising and marketing provided by Standard Hotels are part of the acts of use of a trade mark within the meaning of the EU Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
On Monday, February 12, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization about the February 8, 2024 oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
In most cases involving the abandonment of a still-famous mark--although ill-famed-- the U.S. courts have examined whether a trade mark owner's de minimis use of a mark was sufficient to maintain the owner's exclusive rights Silverman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known  mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Being so misconceived, the court stated that the objection lacked merit and was thus dismissed. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 8:54 am
Mark Orr won a misdemeanor battery conviction in State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:22 am by Contributor
by Matt Borick The arrival of October marks an historic milestone for password privacy law. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Prasco LLC v Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. and Imaginative Research (Fed. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am by Benjamin Wittes
Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins gave the following statement to the press this morning: Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins Remarks at Guantanamo Bay 6 May 2012 Good morning. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]