Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 681 - 700
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
The first, State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
In Brown v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:44 am
When you're litigating against the United States, there are lots and lots of ways to lose. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The provision states: "13A. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Here is the abstract: Professor Mark Tushnet contends that Roper v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:59 pm
Gravelle v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:01 am
In Dirks v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:32 am
Some of you certainly remember the Google v Vuitton case decided by the CJEU some years ago now, in 2010, which was a case about trade mark infringement. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
It did so largely on the basis of its interpretation of Article 9(1) of Directive 89/104, the key wording of which is "has acquiesced, for a period of five successive years, in the use of a later trade mark registered in that Member State while being aware of such use". [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
ThermoLife Int’l, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York Buffalo Law School, has posted When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:29 am
In last week’s case (Han v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:05 am
Dureska [3/4/22] Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States denied review in Savannah College of Art and Design v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
Nando’s states that their marks are infringed on the outside sign, inside the Fernando’s restaurant and on the menu.Aziz claims that he is being bullied into changing his company’s name and had no intention of copying Nando’s - he wanted to sell Peri Peri chicken, being of Portuguese origin, using the Portuguese chicken as a symbol of the cuisine. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:54 am
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
However, if a mark was registered or applied for before the dates of accession of new Member States, then the relevant territory, and therefore relevant public, is made up only of the States that composed the EU at the relevant time (Art. 165(4)(a)). [read post]
