Search for: "State v. Martinez" Results 681 - 700 of 1,776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am by Staff Writer
Checking for intoxication at roadside stops became legal after the 1975 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Most compelling in a review of the Mendoza-Martinez factors is that the State has a very important non-punitive purpose in enacting this designation provision and it has tailored a limited provision to deal with this purpose. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
With respect to the specific Article 10 provision at issue in this proceeding, Section 10.07(c), in 2010, in State of New York v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:07 am by Joy Waltemath
However, their claims for benefits under ERISA were dismissed with prejudice because they involved a dispute over the interpretation and application of the terms of a collectively bargained health plan, which was subject to arbitration under the Railway Labor Act (Hall v BNSF Railway Co, September 22, 2014, Martinez, R). [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently issued a decision on this subject in the case of Martinez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
(a)) and the court sentenced him to 25 years to life in state prison”, he appealed. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
Martinez, 221 Ariz. 383, ¶ 14, 212 P.3d 75, 79 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2009) quoting U.S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
The question newly added in the petition is a sequel to the Court’s ruling two years ago in the case of Martinez v. [read post]