Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co."
Results 681 - 700
of 787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
The State of Advertising Bob Garfield, Author, The Chaos Scenario; co-host, NPR’s On the Media NBC is doomed except as a cable channel: tech and simple economics undermine TV’s business model. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:45 am
In this regard, the Interim Report recommends that the WFL prohibit workplace discrimination in respect of the following characteristics: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, (v) disability and mental health conditions (the “Protected Characteristics”). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
Circuit in 1973’s National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
KBM, as detailed in U.S.A. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:19 pm
The Kaiser v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
Fitbug Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
(PEN America), the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC), and the Student Press Law Center (SPLC), arguing that liability would violate the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Mrs Norman – The Wife who lost her ‘cloak of anonymity: Blog on the Court of Appeal decision in Norman v Norman. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
I promised quite a while ago to say more about Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Times v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
The legislation had more than 100 co-sponsors in the House. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” But I have also chided her for several years because of the title of a leading casebook—The Law of Democracy—that she co-edits with two other good friends whom I also respect greatly and, as with Pam, have learned much from over the years, Sam Issacharoff (a former colleague at Texas) and Rick Pildes. [read post]
