Search for: "State v. Simpson"
Results 681 - 700
of 799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2008, 9:26 pm
The immigration courts, relying on the circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Simpson did not hold to the contrary. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:03 am
In addition to lack of temporal and spacial proximity, the recent SCC case of Mustapha v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:58 pm
In addition to lack of temporal and spacial proximity, the recent SCC case of Mustapha v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Simpson, No. 07-5193, 07-5194 Imposition of a 450-month term of imprisonment and a denial of defendant's motion to dismiss a charge of escape is affirmed over claims that: 1) the sentence was unreasonable; 2) the district court erred in denying a motion to dismiss the escape indictment for violating the Double Jeopardy Clause; and 3) procedurally barred claims. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 9:28 am
Kaye v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:54 am
Case Name: Wunsch v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:48 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Courtney Simpson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:23 pm
Consider a case like United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:31 am
(State) (52399) [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:36 pm
Relying extensively on Press Enterprise v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Simpson Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington 08a0298p.06 2008/08/18 USA v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:23 pm
A tip of the cyberhat to Kennedy Simpson for passing along to us a new medical device preemption decision in Kentucky state court, Mattingly v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 8:18 am
Carpetbagger, Watching it all fall apart at once: McCain’s foreign policy in tatters Pumped: It looks real, but it’s true, so that’s the giveaway that it’s a fake: Talkleft, Obama v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:07 am
What if the auctioneer was John Simpson who conducts sporting collectible auctions and usually sells a few decoys? [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 3:06 pm
In the case of Simpson v. [read post]
