Search for: "State v. South"
Results 681 - 700
of 11,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2015, 7:49 am
First, on February 20, 2015, it denied certiorari in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:18 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:14 am
State, which was one such matter out of South Carolina. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:14 am
State, which was one such matter out of South Carolina. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
One of these is the South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
Rev. 1 (2019): Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:00 am
Rev. 116 (2021): The United States Supreme Court saved the states’ sales tax base in the landmark case of South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm
Hayes Holderness (Richmond) presents Navigating 21st Century Tax Jurisdiction at Temple today as part of its Faculty Colloquium Series: Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:48 am
Googlepotentially United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:01 am
Ed. 2d 561 (1963) (noting that Acts of Congress have “strong presumptive validity’); State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:20 am
As the Court explained in South Carolina v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
Citibank (South Dakota), N. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
Defendant's Motion for Judicial Notice dated August13, 2007, filed in State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:37 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:33 pm
There is a crime that still exists in South Africa which is rather quaintly named “scandalising the courts”. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:01 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP both involved congressional redistricting. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:21 am
” Kay v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:59 am
As noted in the 2007 decision by Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal in Krathen v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
In Copyright Agency Limited v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 35, the High Court decided that the State of New South Wales was not entitled to use surveyors' plans (by copying the survey plans and providing them to the public) without fairly remunerating copyright owners. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:18 am
In its 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
