Search for: "State v. South" Results 681 - 700 of 11,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 5:01 am by Kate Fort
Ed. 2d 561 (1963) (noting that Acts of Congress have “strong presumptive validity’); State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm by Paul Caron
Hayes Holderness (Richmond) presents Navigating 21st Century Tax Jurisdiction at Temple today as part of its Faculty Colloquium Series: Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:00 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 116 (2021): The United States Supreme Court saved the states’ sales tax base in the landmark case of South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm by Paul Caron
Rev. 1 (2019): Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Dean Freeman
As noted in the 2007 decision by Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal in Krathen v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 11:30 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
This all changed in 1991 when the Supreme Court of South Carolina ruled in Nelson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Jan Neels
The recent decision of the Eastern Cape High Court in Grahamstown (South Africa) in Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG) deals with cross-border defamation in a commercial context. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
Defendant's Motion for Judicial Notice dated August13, 2007, filed in State v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:01 am by Derek Muller
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP both involved congressional redistricting. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
In Copyright Agency Limited v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 35, the High Court decided that the State of New South Wales was not entitled to use surveyors' plans (by copying the survey plans and providing them to the public) without fairly remunerating copyright owners. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]