Search for: "State v. Stark" Results 681 - 700 of 1,758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Moustafa Badreldin
This is in stark contrast to prior cases in the Third and Eleventh circuits that stated that consent could in fact be revoked. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
John Stark Reed Readers undoubtedly are aware of the recent outbreak of ransomware incidents and the problems they present. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm
As we argued in our friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
 That's no only because that prior opinion squarely involved the analogous seizure of an automobile for (relatively) minor conduct, but also because the Supreme Court's holding in that opinion was memorably harsh.The state in Bennis passed a statute that allowed the state to seize a vehicle -- forever -- if that car was used to pick up a prostitute. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
If the VRA still applies, how does it apply when we no longer have in North Carolina the extreme and stark racial polarization of earlier decades? [read post]