Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Ferguson’s “separate but equal” principle — even after the judiciary announced the opposing mandate of Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
The Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
Procito v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:54 pm
This is a useful enterprise, it may erase substantial nuance that itself might provide the basis for a deeper understanding of SWFs within globalization and in the context of a state system in which not all states are created equal. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
2017: A Year of CAFC Feedback & Agency Refocus With so much attention being paid to Oil States, it was easy to lose sight of many of the more noteworthy Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) related decisions of 2017. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
Board of Education on African-American education and educational traditions in the South. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
Tuscola next claimed that the Township’s zoning ordinance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States and Michigan Constitutions, on its face and as it was applied to them. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
The second example discussed by O’Connor, Kennedy and Souter was the overruling of the racial segregation doctrine of separate-but-equal that had been adopted by the court in 1896 in Plessy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
State Farm Fire & Casualty (Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent), 2007 Westlaw 4530994 (N.Y. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
Virginia Board of Elections (383 U.S. 663, 1966), the Supreme Court overruled its decision in Breedlove v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 11:28 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
See Zogenix, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:55 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:55 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
