Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 681 - 700
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm
Soldal v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Franita Tolson – In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
” State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:35 am
"Writing in the 1958 case of Trop v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am
Ted Strickland, a Democrat. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:39 pm
April 2018 Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Strickland, 2010 U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court has found ineffective assistance only a handful of times since it raised the bar in a 1984 case, Strickland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 10:47 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a substantial defense” – rather than the standard… [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
