Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 681 - 700
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
That the AEDPA (anti terrorism and effective death penalty act) requires federal courts to give state courts great deference in interpreting the law, and that great deference combined with the fact that the supreme court has never held that a failure to give a closing argument is ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:43 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 12:03 pm
., State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 12:03 pm
., State v. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
Strickland Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusPetition for rehearing en banc denied. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
DiazDocket: 10-1264Issue(s): (1) Whether it is necessarily unreasonable under Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
State, 1 Ga. 243 (1846), reaffirmed, Strickland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Strickland in holding that those districts were not narrowly tailored to the compelling governmental interest of compliance with the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
