Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 681 - 700
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
” The Court of Appeal reasoned that because the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
” The Court of Appeal reasoned that because the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:10 am
According to the Eureka (CA) Times-Standard, a California state Superior Court judge has rejected a broad facial state constitutional challenge to all prayers at city council meetings. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 11:48 am
The decision in Phone Recovery Services, LLC. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 5:22 am
State of California (Madera County Superior Court): Verified Cross Complaint – North Fork Rancheria 140227 The underlying suit appears to have dismissed on March 3, but with leave to amend: March 3 2014 Ruling [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:54 am
Recently, the Superior Court, in Goodemote v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 7:12 pm
On April 30, a state Superior Court panel ruled that a child can have three legal parents. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
The trial judge had him at $60 an hour and the Superior Court is signaling “too much! [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:07 am
Williams v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 832, 838-839.) [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:39 pm
That judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal (Morales v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:18 pm
The deal fell apart and SeaHavn sued Glitnir Bank in the King County Superior Court. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:07 pm
(Maricopa County Superior Court No. 1999004298CR): Mr. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 1:47 pm
Superior Court, 178 Cal. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In the case of Loftus v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) is pending before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:00 pm
Superior Court (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 25. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
The first was "negligent marketing," which the Superior Court limited strictly to overpromotion:Appellant next argues that her claim for “negligent marketing” is cognizable under Baldino v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
On February 4, 2013 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Auer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Official Commentary to G.S. 15A-1335 (recognizing this point); State v. [read post]