Search for: "State v. Superior Court" Results 681 - 700 of 11,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2006, 8:05 am
State of Indiana (Interlocutory Appeal from the Marion Superior Court No. 49G02-0412-MR-232452 Hon. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 8:19 am by Wally Zimolong
In January 2012, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a decision in Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am by Andy Zahn - Guest
Superior Court (1987), in this case because of the remoteness of the subsidiaries’ connections to North Carolina. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 5:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State of California (Madera County Superior Court): Verified Cross Complaint – North Fork Rancheria 140227 The underlying suit appears to have dismissed on March 3, but with leave to amend: March 3 2014 Ruling [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 7:12 pm
On April 30, a state Superior Court panel ruled that a child can have three legal parents. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:54 am by admin
Recently, the Superior Court, in Goodemote v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
According to the Eureka (CA) Times-Standard, a California state Superior Court judge has rejected a broad facial state constitutional challenge to all prayers at city council meetings. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:29 am by Zachary B. Cooper, Attorney at Law, P.C.
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently reversed and remanded an appellant’s DUI conviction in light of the Supreme Court’s June 2016 ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:29 am by Zachary B. Cooper, Attorney at Law, P.C.
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently reversed and remanded an appellant’s DUI conviction in light of the Supreme Court’s June 2016 ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
”  The Court of Appeal reasoned that because the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
”  The Court of Appeal reasoned that because the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 2:41 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that Section 2802 of the Labor Code, which requires employers to reimburse employees for their reasonable on-the-job expenses, doesn't apply to state employees, including faculty at public universities.There are other ways, of course, in which teaching at a public university is superior; in particular, in the protections afforded by the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause, which apply in public schools but substantially less so in… [read post]