Search for: "State v. Williamson"
Results 681 - 700
of 975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2021, 7:10 am
Ferncliff Cemetery Association, Inc. v Town of Greenburgh, 2021 WL 31948 (2nd Cir CA 2/1/2021) [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:06 pm
Kereluik v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 10:26 pm
Cashman v Lane, 2016 WL 1305106 (D. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
Carolene Products Co., supra, at 152; see also Williamson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 938 A.2d 417 (Pa. 2007) (3-2 decision with two concurrences in the result), was not even cited in Maya. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 10:38 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 284 N.J. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:10 pm
Central Time, the Texas Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Severance v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
But Hibbs said a case styled Holder v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
See California Civil Discovery Practice, 4th Edition, (CEB 2019) §3.157A citing Williamson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
"Today's decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the Court will overrule next…" The next overrule came last week: a 5-4 decision along ideological lines that scrapped Williamson County v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:23 am
The city relied upon the ripeness rule of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
Herbert Hovenkamp, the Ben V. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that… [read post]