Search for: "State v. Worst"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 10:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
Here are my selections for the best of 2009's worst. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
State legislatures passed laws to curtail states from invoking Kelo. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Ferguson was among the three worst offenders. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:00 am
LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:46 pm
See Snell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
Other than Buell, the two worst decisions are federal predictions of state law that have both since been rejected by the Supreme Courts of the states whose law they purported to predict. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
San Francisco Tomorrow, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Not for now, though, and if one judge on the panel in State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:45 pm
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Rix LJ found it significant Campbell and others v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
In Ticconi v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 1:25 am
[United States v. [read post]
