Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 681 - 700
of 727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Steve Vladeck writes at Lawfare about an amicus brief filed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in support of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
A recent episode of Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast features a conversation between law professor Steve Vladeck and “Tom Goldstein, the veteran U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
But, again, that wasn’t the question — just as it wasn’t the question for the Quirin court, as Steve Vladeck has pointed out (emphasis in original): The question, of course, is what Quirin meant by “offenses committed by enemy belligerents against the law of war. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck contends that the “majority avoided a potentially momentous holding on the availability vel non of injunctive relief to enforce federal statutes. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Steve Vladeck identifies what he describes as a “subtle but serious flaw” in the decision at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck previews his testimony this morning before the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
Steve Vladeck recently showed how this is the case with his analysis of “shadow docket” decisions where the solicitor general plays a role. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 4:09 am
And to add to the amusement, Steve Vladeck points out what’s “clear” about these shenanigans. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Steve Vladeck analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:49 pm
Professor Dan Solove, who's hosting Blawg Review next at Concurring Opinions states: "Welcome to the blogsophere to National Security Advisors, a national security law blog by an all-star team of Bobby Chesney (law, Wake Forest), Steve Vladeck (law, Miami), and Tung Yin (law, Iowa). [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck notes that the Court denied cert. in Ali v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:39 am
Steve Vladeck at Just Security has pointed out that a r [read post]
4 Jan 2025, 7:25 am
[Note: After patiently hearing me out on this topic since the election, Jack asked me to write this up. [read post]
16 Jun 2025, 4:21 am
Alexander Cornwell, Parisa Hafezi, and Steve aHolland report for Reuters. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm
The abundance of tweets at the AALS Annual Meeting (#AALS2015) made me sit up and take notice of how many more law professors there seem to be on Twitter now compared to 2012 when I last updated the Census of Law Professor Twitter users (see Version 1.0 here and Version 2.0 here). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:36 am
[See Steve Vladeck’s piece yesterday on the details of the Proclamation and why it is unlawful.] [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 12:40 pm
Nevertheless, as Steve Vladeck summarized, "[T]he consensus has long been that it would cause chaos if grants or denials of TROs were immediately appealable. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
(Marbury came up quite a bit during oral argument in the case, and Steve Vladeck, who argued for Ortiz and other petitioners, will no doubt remember that Kennedy asked him whether he thought Marbury was right.) [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue and Steve Vladeck report that the court’s broad reading of the exemption “came in a case concerning food stamps, in which a South Dakota newspaper had sought data from the Department of Agriculture on the number of stores participating in the federal food stamp program, and store-by-store data on the amount of purchases made using food stamps. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
” Commentary comes from: Jeffrey Bellin, who at CNN writes that “Merrick Garland can help bring the Supreme Court together, pushing at least one of the three branches of government out of the political muck”; Ilya Shapiro, who at Forbes contends that the “Senate is fully within its rights, given the unique nature of this judicial vacancy, to fulfill its ‘advice and consent’ function by telling the president that we should let this fall’s election determine… [read post]
