Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2007, 10:29 am
On Wednesday, the Court will hear oral argument in Medellin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:17 am
The Supreme Court has today handed down its latest Blakely ruling with its decision in Oregon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
SEC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:32 pm
Arroyo-Audifred v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 12:25 pm
Segarra-Jimenez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Example: NTP v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
We are entering a strange new legal universe, a new international legal order of some kind, here in the second decade of the third millennium – please make sure that your seat belts are securely fastened and that your tray tables are in the upright and locked position. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
McDaniel in McDaniel v. 162 Columbia Heights Housing Corp. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
But there is a strange lack of fit between the interest asserted and the means used to further it. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
At Monday's oral argument in Nijhawan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:30 am
However, I recently re-visited a 1929 case with an intriguing family connection: Dedman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
There's a fine line between "dangerously mentally ill" versus "dangerously incredibly strange". [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 1:12 pm
So again, strange as it may seem, in Massachusetts a defendant can be found guilty of armed robbery without using or threatening to use any violence whatsoever. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:22 pm
It seems strange to say that after a guy throws a gun away, after it's crystal clear there are no shots fired, and after the guy simply keeps running after throwing a gun away, an officer can wait four seconds and then shoot the guy, no reasonable person in the universe could say anything other than "Yeah, that seems right to me. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:51 pm
Crazy, again, to use the full name of the victim but use initials for the person ultimately found to have committed the abuse.Plus, the decision here is sort of strange because when the opinion was initially rendered, it was unpublished, but used Nicole's full last name, both in the caption and in the text. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
This seems strange. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:20 am
The Case of the Day, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
Perez-Acevedo v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:23 am
Very strange goings-on. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 5:42 pm
Buckley also emphasizes a Supreme Court decision from 1885 (not a typo), Strang v. [read post]
