Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
The Georgia Attorney General counters in his opp that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision is correct under a straightforward application of Strickland v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:14 am
Wainwright) and there's the right to have that counsel be at least minimally effective (Strickland v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 3:54 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:21 pm
Judge Assigned the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:48 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 16, 2010 Evans v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:23 pm
See Cohen v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
Week of March 29, 2010: In Favor of the State or Government Quintanilla v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
See US v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am
Global BC v The Queen [2010] BCCA 169 is an interesting case concerning media access to evidence in criminal trials. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:37 pm
Plain Dealer Publishing Co., a state court judge (Shirley Strickland Saffold) is suing the Cleveland Plan Dealer for stating that comments posted on the newspaper’s website under the screen name “lawmiss” originated from a computer used by the judge and/or her daughter. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:32 am
JAC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:33 am
And:Also Monday, Governor Ted Strickland signed a comprehensive reform bill into law aimed at combating wrongful convictions in the state, including measures to address the high risk of error in eyewitness identifications. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:20 pm
From this week’s edition: Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court’s sweeping, albeit noncapital, decision in Padilla v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
Thus, the Court concluded, Padilla’s circumstances fell within the scope of Sixth Amendment protection and were subject to analysis under the test established in Strickland v. [read post]
