Search for: "Supreme Court of Oregon" Results 681 - 700 of 4,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 3:33 pm by Dane Johnson
Huling Buick Co., 246 Or 203, 205, 424 P2d 679 (1967), the Oregon Supreme Court pointed out that the “simplest area of tort law is that on the intentional infliction of physical harm. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:32 pm by JP Sarmiento
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 6:43 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (D OR, Oct. 30, 2014), an Oregon federal district court held that "Humanism is a religion for Establishment Clause purposes," observing that "such a view is consistent with longstanding Supreme Court jurisprudence. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 10:48 am by Vin Bonventre
Serio in 2006, did so with the Supreme Court's 1990 decision in Oregon v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:32 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
From Eugene Volokh at The Volokh Conspiracy: I’m glad to say that yesterday the Supreme Court asked the State of Oregon to file a response in Herrera v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm
On Tuesday, October 14, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Oregon v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:36 pm
The Supreme Court shall file its order with the Secretary of State on or before September 15. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:18 pm
"In Oregon, medical pot and guns go hand in hand; But some local sheriffs don't think medical marijuana users should be allowed to obtain concealed weapons permits; The case is before the state Supreme Court": This article will appear Sunday in The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:16 am by Sean Rohtla
Lorenzen, involved the petitioner Bradley Taggart, who had once owned an interest in an Oregon company, and the respondents, the same Oregon company and two of its other owners. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:55 am by John Day
"   The Oregon Supreme Court agreed that exhibits could be made public in the discretion of the trial judge,even though they were originally produced subject to a protective order. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:27 pm
In my June 10, 2008 article (see below) on the Oregon Supreme Court I reported to you that Oregon's top court is rated at the bottom tier of all state supreme courts in the nation. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:12 am by Laura Orr
The Court noted, however, that the United States Supreme Court has not concluded that the uncertainty accompanying time on death row constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:12 am by Laura Orr
The Court noted, however, that the United States Supreme Court has not concluded that the uncertainty accompanying time on death row constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]