Search for: "T MAY"
Results 681 - 700
of 359,331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2009, 5:13 am
Why don't they do something really important like finding Jimmy Hoffa. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
Rather it appears that what is required is that for the skilled person the value has to be recognisable as a singularity, as in decision T 201/83 within or at the end of a range of possibilities which may mark an end-point for a particular sub-range (cf. decision T 201/83 [8-9]).[18] In the present case […] the description as filed discloses that: “In a more preferred embodiment [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
The core decision where this follows from is this decision, T 1329/04. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 11:01 am
The post Appearances may be deceiving: An unassuming weed that can be deadly to people and animals may be in your backyard appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
from the diaries of the tennessee dude... this new u.s. supreme court configuration is a little sneaky, sort of like watching yourself age...it may appear that one day you wake up and notice that "suddenly" you don't look like the man or woman in that picture from 20 years ago...the extra crows feet here, the peppering of grey hair there and you wonder how did that... [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
As stated in T 448/89, a mere reference to documents was not sufficient. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:58 am
If the first patent has claims directed towards the wrong structure, it may well not be infringed by the correct compound, and it is conceivable that this may not be correctable. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 7:27 am
And this is a stumble that may reveal a lot. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
I have to correct them, however, because most states have their own estate tax that may kick in on smaller estates where the federal tax isn’t a concern. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The present claim is comparable to the device claims of the auxiliary request in decision T 775/97 [3.1] which were found not to fall under the exclusion clause of A 52(4) EPC 1973.The reasoning of T 82/93 [1.5-5] is not applicable to the present situation either. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 11:01 am
T 1898/07 (also presented on this blog - here) is also relevant in this context.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:55 am
Don’t let law enforcement or confidential informants force you into doing their dirty work. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:12 am
I want my employees to have 10 days of vacation each year, but I don’t want them to have to wait to use it while it accrues. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 12:48 am
May 1993 - Did He Really Say That? [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 9:06 am
We don't. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 5:48 am
JACOBSON: Shirley Sherrod May Prefer The Life Left Unexamined. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:01 pm
It may be the case that a computer has a particular processor that is particularly good, or particularly poor, at some (class of) operations. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm
And who doesn't love to complain? [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
LPM, in case you don’t know, is a publication of the American Bar Association. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
And may the other parties request an apportionment of costs? [read post]
