Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT"
Results 681 - 700
of 5,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm
Thomas J. accepts that it is, of course, possible for the government to use a private space, which would not by itself exclude First Amendment rights, such as where a private conference room is hired by a government body for the purpose of carrying out a public meeting, but what will dominantly determine the question whether the space is a public space or a private space, is the level of control that the government can exercise over such space. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am
It rejected the government’s argument about the difficulty of proving such knowledge by reference to the "classic" identity theft case, which in the Court’s opinion involves using someone’s information to get access to their bank account or credit card. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In last week’s Supreme Court ruling in Patchak v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
The Commission counters that established precedent conclusively shows that the contracts are securities (SEC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
The biggest impact of the dissent is that she gets a chance to quote a movie line, saying that there's no standing because "Alaska cannot show us the money. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
At issue in No. 06-1005, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
RNC involves one subset of this complex matrix of statutes and regulations governing the use of money in political campaigns — contributions to political parties. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
The case is Peugh v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
See Thomas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:12 am
See, e. g., Weisman, supra, at ---- (slip op., at 14) (Scalia, J., joined by, inter alios, Thomas, J., dissenting); Allegheny County v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
The State and Its Apparatus --John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government --Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:34 am
Thomas M. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:38 pm
The conventional wisdom is that the Supreme Court settled the issue a century ago in Fidelity & Deposit Company v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:22 am
The government has filed its opposition to cert in the case of Al Madhwani v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:07 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:59 am
Only Justice Thomas played the Grinch as the sole dissenter in the Court's 8-1 decision in Lopez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:40 am
Kaley v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Circuit pointedly observed in its seminal decision in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 11:18 am
Rather than using federal Superfund money to clean up the site, the federal government sued Guam in 2002 under the Clean Water Act to stop pollution leaching from the dump from contaminating a nearby river. [read post]
