Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Homesteads apply to “homes” owned by sole owners, joint tenants, tenants by the entirety, tenant in common, life estate holders, and the holders of beneficial interests in a real estate trust holding title to a residence. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
The following are just brief notes – more detail when we have it.Mr M was Wandsworth secure tenant, having succeeded his mother, and had lived in the property for some 30 years. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day, Delizia Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 8:17 am
The Sixth Circuit’s Business Development Corporation of South Carolina v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
Since the agreement’s enforceability was a focal point of the case, and the tenant was found to have asserted a “material factual statement” that was false, the court awarded costs to the cooperative.When the Appellate Term, First Department, affirmed on appeal, we doubt the tenant-shareholder sanctioned the outcome.To download a copy of the Appellate Term’s decision, please use this link: 1050 Tenants Corp.… [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:22 am
The case is Cummings Properties LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:31 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
In Duane Reade v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
In Akorita v 36 Gensing Road Ltd LRX/16/2008 (.pdf), the Lands Tribunal considered whether or not the Appellant had been properly served with a notice under s.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:51 am
October 30, 2018) (removal of state court complaint to federal court alleging defendant property management company hired law firms to conduct eviction proceedings for a flat fee, and their attempt to collect court costs and attorneys’ fees from apartment tenants before such costs and fees were awarded violates the North Carolina Residential Rental Agreements Act, North Carolina Debt Collection Act, and related state laws) Wilk v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 3:45 am
Where, as here, the defendants submitted evidentiary material in support of that branch of their cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint, the criterion becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether one is stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 845). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:23 am
Reply Brief, Harmon v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
Kokesh v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
Last month, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an opinion in Town of Kearny v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The certification also stated plaintiff “[understood] that [defendant] reserve[d] the right to null and void the auction and sale of the unit for any reason. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Next, we have s.124: (1) Where a notice under s. 122 (…) has been served by the tenant, the landlord shall, unless the notice is withdrawn, serve on the tenant … a written notice either - (a) admitting his right, or (b) denying it and stating the reasons why, in the opinion of the landlord, the tenant does not have the right to buy. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Next, we have s.124: (1) Where a notice under s. 122 (…) has been served by the tenant, the landlord shall, unless the notice is withdrawn, serve on the tenant … a written notice either - (a) admitting his right, or (b) denying it and stating the reasons why, in the opinion of the landlord, the tenant does not have the right to buy. [read post]
