Search for: "The Book Review Editor" Results 681 - 700 of 3,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 1:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
She advised me when I handed her the book, that it was required by all law review candidates–the board of editors run a program at my school and require the text. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The focus of the book is not on such traditional law but on what makes a signature a signature at all for legal purposes. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 11:20 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: EditorialEditorial: In This Issue; In This Issue – Reviews; The Three Scholars behind ScholarOne: EJIL’s Associate Editors ArticlesMadelaine Chiam, Monique Cormier, and Anna Hood, Law, War and Letter Writing Taylor St John, Malcolm Langford, Yuliya Chernykh, Øyvind Stiansen, Tarald Gulseth Berge, & Sergio Puig, Bargaining in the Shadow of AwardsJason Webb Yackee, The First French BITHedi Viterbo & Yulia Ioffe, No Refuge from… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 6:45 am
And for an exhaustive set of steps that students should follow when writing and publishing papers, I recommend Eugene Volokh's excellent book, Academic Legal Writing. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:01 am by Administrator
Editors note: This week’s thinkpiece was timed up to publish concurrently with Judy Gaskell’s review of the same book. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm by Stephen Masterson
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Timothy D. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Moderated by David Ulin, editor of the Los Angeles Times Book Review. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:30 am
The same day brought to my mailbox the April issue of the Michigan Law Review, the always compulsively readable book review issue, which contains my own review of Covering. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s my thinking on the substantive question (as opposed to the question of whether law review editors are overeager to replace passive voice with the active), from my Academic Legal Writing book.Many people recommend that you turn the passive voice — “The action was done by this person” (the object was verbed by the subject) or just “The action was done” — into the active voice, “This person did this action” (the subject… [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
The Carnival travels to a new location each week, facilitated by the good Editor at Blawg Review. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 3:15 am by Tori Hawekotte
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Doron Dorfman, an associate professor at Seton Hall Law, and Thomas F. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 10:19 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
You will, of course, need a book proposal to send to the editor. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:30 am by Nate Holdren
That was really nice because I kept a sense of motion - I stayed in the middle - and I was in contact with editors and co-authors. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:13 pm
"Walking among the anxious runners in the staging area for the race at Fort Wadsworth in Staten Island, sitting in the shadow of the Verazanno-Narrows Bridge, Marty and I found the anonymous Editor of Blawg Review. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:11 am by Steve Lubet
The Jewish Review of Books, to which I subscribe, does this constantly; it’s almost an involuntary reflex of the picture editor. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
The recommended length (including footnotes) is 9,000-12,000 words for articles, 1,500-2,500 words for DiF pieces, and 1,000-1,500 words for book reviews. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:04 am by Joe Silver
Roberts, cited reviews that emphasized the novel's “positive view of questioning authority, lauding ‘hacker culture,’ discussing sex and sexuality in passing" as his motivation for trying to steer students clear of the book. [read post]
19 May 2013, 3:00 am by Administrator
Docherty requested a ministerial review. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 12:29 pm by Sophie Corke
Ford's 'The Intellectual Property of Nations: Sociological and Historical Perspectives on a Modern Legal Institution', Book Review Editor Hayleigh Bosher described the work as "unique in its offering of a combination of sociological and legal perspectives on the emergence of intellectual property". [read post]