Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 681 - 700
of 49,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
The judgment follows the precedent set in Richard v BBC, that individuals investigated by law enforcement bodies have a reasonable expectation of privacy as a matter of general principle. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
" In 1923, the law was changed to prohibit carrying a dirk or dagger only if it was "concealed upon his person. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:33 am
On October 11, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Mikisew Cree First Nation v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
Upon learning that Justice Mitchell was coming to campus, protesters prepared a written critique of his opinion, circulated it within the law school, and invited people to attend a competing event. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
Apparently, under Mexican law, you can't do anything else. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:27 pm
Because maybe, depending on the facts, that counts as extortion.And you'll find yourself 75 years old, ineligible to practice law, unable to afford an attorney, and with a court-appointed lawyer for your second criminal trial. [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:42 pm
., stalking, domestic violence, etc.).However, if that's indeed the case, the law should be changed.Defendant tries to extort a job from someone by threatening him. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 2:46 pm
A version of "Name That Tune" with respect to opinions from the California Court of Appeal would be to attempt to accurately and summarize the thing in as few sentences as possible.For this opinion from today, I can Name That Tune in a single sentence:The evidence isn't insufficient as a matter of law to keep someone detained as an SVP when he's a repeat child molester who forthrightly admits that he can't guarantee that he won't molest another child upon his… [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 9:31 am
Most people believe it is when two people live together as a couple for some amount of time. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
Wade as well as people who backed the planned... [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:09 am
Case citation: hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
Cara McClellan (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted When Claims Collide: Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:40 am
Miller v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 7:03 am
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlKitras v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
At common law, it used to be that burglary was the breaking and entering of a dwelling place at nighttime. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 12:46 pm
In December, the Supreme Court will hear arguments for CVS v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
In People v Linzy and People v Blank, it was held that if this distinction between procedural and substantive changes in the law were mechanically applied, there would be no doubt that the repeal of corroboration laws would not be encompassed within the Ex Post Facto Clause, since such laws do not add to the legislatively defined sex crimes, do not alter the elements of existing crimes, do not elevate the punishment for existing crimes… [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 5:41 am
Beccera v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
