Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 681 - 700 of 11,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 9:01 am
San Diego has both State and Federal Courts and the ruling was issued by San Diego Federal District Chief Judge Gonzalez. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:15 am by SHG
Is it just one person, one monumentally stupid person, or is this the view of the California Bar Association? [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:21 am by Beth Graham
The United States Supreme Court has upheld an arbitration clause that bars satellite television consumers from engaging in collective action against the service provider. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 7:11 pm
A California appellate court recently rejected the request of John Fuchs, a divorce attorney, for $250,000 in fees -- and referred him to the State Bar of California for possible discipline -- on the ground that his tactics in a divorce proceeding aggravated a simple case into a costly legal feud that wasted the parties' money. [read post]
30 May 2009, 10:25 am by Richard Granat
The Unauthorized Committee of the Bar cites  In re Reynoso, 477 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2007) , a case that was decided by a Federal court in California on a different set of facts. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:16 am by Anthony Zaller
Even with California officials currently barred from enforcing AB 51, there is some potential risk to employers if AB 51 ultimately survives this court challenge. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:16 am by Anthony Zaller
Even with California officials currently barred from enforcing AB 51, there is some potential risk to employers if AB 51 ultimately survives this court challenge. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:58 am
As detailed in this San Francisco Chronicle article, headlined "State Supreme Court to hear challenge to sex-offender residency law," California's highest court has decided to give the state's new residency restrictions a closer look. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 7:10 am by Legal Profession Prof
The California State Bar Court Hearing Department found insufficient evidence of several allegations but nonetheless found violations that led to a disbarment recommendation. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:32 pm by William Weinberg
Six new measures were enacted, and barring court challenges will become law beginning next year. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:08 pm by Chris Dreyer
The State Bar of California sets the rules for attorney advertising in the state in its Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:31 pm by Legal Profession Prof
A criminal conviction led to disbarment in California for conduct described in the report of the State Bar Court Hearing Department On March 25, 2014, respondent pled guilty to one count of violating Title 8 United States Code section 1324(a)(2)B)(iii)... [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:46 am by McKennon Law Group
Ohio National Life Assurance Corporation, __ Cal.Rptr.3d. __ 2023 WL 4069794 (2023) that will allow disability claimants with the ability to bring claims in California state courts that disability insurers have asserted to be barred by statutes of limitations. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:34 am by Brandon Gatto
Though the measure bars state and local agencies from considering race or gender in employment, contracting, and education, 55 applicants to... [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 5:45 am
"Rapist, now quadriplegic, a threat, court rules": Today in The San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Egelko has an article that begins, "A rapist who was paralyzed from the neck down in a prison stabbing may still be dangerous and can be kept behind bars under a state law that allows the release of some permanently disabled inmates, a state appeals court ruled Tuesday. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:19 pm by Neumann Law Group
The California Court of Appeal for the second district affirmed, holding that apart from the MICRA issue, the lower court’s ruling was appropriate because the disclosure was permissible under the litigation privilege rule codified in California Civil Code section 47(b). [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:19 pm by Neumann Law Group
The California Court of Appeal for the second district affirmed, holding that apart from the MICRA issue, the lower court’s ruling was appropriate because the disclosure was permissible under the litigation privilege rule codified in California Civil Code section 47(b). [read post]