Search for: "The United States v. State of Idaho" Results 681 - 700 of 851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
Another major sticking point was Section 5, which singled out certain states like Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Virginia, as well as South Carolina, and certain counties in North Carolina, Arizona, Hawaii, and Idaho that would not be allowed to adopt new voting procedures unless they are pre-approved by the United States Attorney General or reviewed after the United States District Court for the District of Columbia hears the… [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 1:29 pm by Ilya Somin
It may lead some red states to try to enact laws barring their citizens from crossing state lines to get abortions, or punishing those who aid them, a step already considered by state legislatures in Missouri and Idaho. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-402Issues: (1) Whether National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:26 am by Steve Hall
The government of France has issued the statement, "United States - Execution of Marvin Wilson. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Common Cause investigated how the religious right fought for the deregulation of political spending, and won in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:16 am by Kate Tummarello
Most recently, we saw a troubling decision out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm by John Ross
In 2020, Idaho passed a law to prohibit most abortions in the state in the event the Supreme Court ever overturned Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Idaho Contractors Board, 19-66Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should revisit its holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:10 pm by David Urban
  The United States Supreme Court has created a “policymaker exception” to First Amendment protection, recognizing that an elected official must be able to appoint some high-level politically loyal individuals who will help him or her implement the goals or programs for which the public voted. [read post]