Search for: "Thomas Warren" Results 681 - 700 of 1,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Elizabeth Warren, the head of the Bureau, has called arbitration "Darth Vader's Death Star--the Empire always wins. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 I learned much from Jean Hampton, Greg Kavka, Thomas Hill, and Warren Quinn. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:59 am by SHG
Would he have refused to lunch with Justice Thomas or former C.J. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:05 pm by Aaron Kaufman
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) represent steps in the right direction but still do not fully erase the wages and wealth distinction, he argues. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
I have not read so unconstrained an opinion since the Warren Court made an art form of it (albeit often to reach a correct result). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 11:01 am by Victoria Kwan
Citing Chief Justice Earl Warren’s short, unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor notes that the case “is being closely watched . . . as a potential indicator of a pro-business slant at the high court under Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
Two of those Justices (Thomas and Kennedy) have agreed that Blaine Amendments were “born of bigotry” and “should be buried now. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:44 am by The Charge
  Adams lost a bitterly contested election to his former friend come rival, Thomas Jefferson. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Reacting to the Warren Court’s string of liberal decisions, they regularly criticized so-called judicial activism and warned about the tendency of judges to play an expansive role in addressing controversial cultural and social issues or to “legislate” from the bench. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
Critics of the court under Chief Justice Earl Warren from 1953 to 1969 said the justices were too willing to abandon precedent in an effort to expand civil rights and civil liberties. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor notes that the case “is being closely watched . . . as a potential indicator of a pro-business slant at the high court under Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:02 am by boston
John Fea, author of Was America Founded As a Christian Nation: A Historical Introduction, is also on the case.)Barton knows that he’s intellectually outgunned by these real scholars, so he’s lashing out at them with all of the name-calling and straw-man arguments that have marked his work over the years.That’s the real story – simple and uncomplicated.Issues: Descriptions and Activities of Religious Right Groups, Responding to Common Attacks on Church-State Separation,… [read post]
Taken in historical order, they were Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am by Samuel Bray
Expanding the frame of our inquiry even this much reveals that the injunction that reaches beyond the plaintiffs—and the law-declaration model of the judicial power that this remedy implies—is not some late-blooming efflorescence of post-Warren Court judicial hubris. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
More importantly, the political composition of the Supreme Court became more conservative with the appointments of Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm by Daniel Hemel
” Gorsuch — who along with Thomas has emerged as Chevron’s most scathing critic on the court — cheers that result. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Thomas Colby has made a version of this argument, and a similar argument has been advanced by Peter Smith. [read post]