Search for: "Thomas v. Big " Results 681 - 700 of 1,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
In March, City Health Commissioner Thomas Farley wrote an article in The  Philadelphia Inquirer supporting the tax, saying “the city is meeting its revenue projections. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Daniel Tokaji
The Court upheld the remaining district in Bethune-Hill, with only Justice Thomas dissenting. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On Friday the Government announced that Sir Ian Burnett has been appointed as the new Lord Chief Justice, to replace the retiring Lord Thomas from the 2 October 2017. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
— Clarence Thomas, My Grandfather’s Son: A Memoir (2008): Provocative, inspiring, and unflinchingly honest, this is the story of one of America’s most remarkable and controversial leaders, Justice Clarence Thomas, told in his own words. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
Masterpiece Cakeshop has been granted....The big addition today is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Dan Farber
The Supreme Court ruled today on Murr v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
” Supreme Court short-lister Judge Thomas Hardiman dissented. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Bebchuk, Alon Brav, Wei Jiang, and Thomas Keusch, on Tuesday, May 30, 2017 Tags: Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Executive performance, Executive turnover, Firm performance, Hedge funds, Ousting directors, Proxy fights, Proxy voting, Rent-seeking, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Target firms Clarity on the “Quasi-Appraisal” Remedy and Post-Closing Claims Posted by Ignacio E. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:14 am by Leah Litman
The petition I want to flag (which the Court also acted on this morning) is Jaffe v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
Clark, here; patent-venue case TC Heartland LLP v. [read post]