Search for: "Towns v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 5,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2019, 2:30 pm
State of Wisconsin ex rel Michael Anderson v Town of Newbold, 2019 WL 5556275 (WI App. 10/29/2019) [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 5:48 am
Whistle Stop Farms, LLC v Town of Thompson Station, 2018 WL 5313340 (MD TN 10/26/2018) [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:10 pm
There are less than 6000 of you in the town. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:10 am
Ferncliff Cemetery Association, Inc. v Town of Greenburgh, 2021 WL 31948 (2nd Cir CA 2/1/2021) [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
Removal of a public officer by the Appellate Division pursuant to Public Officers Law §36Matter of Salvador v Ross, 2009 NY Slip Op 02710, decided on April 9, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJohn Salvador Jr. asked the court to remove Teri Ross from her position of Assessor of the Town of Queensbury pursuant to Public Officers Law §36 for "mismanagement. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:08 am
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006). [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 10:20 pm
Manuel Barba v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
Hayes v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am
(Federal Excise Taxation - Tobacco Products) Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Plaintiff had contended that Plaintiff's right to equal protection was violated because Plaintiff was denied an "on-street parking permit" for a specified location in the Town on the ground that Plaintiff was not a resident at the location involved.The Appellate Division said that the Town had established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and that Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition.With respect to Plaintiff's… [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Plaintiff had contended that Plaintiff's right to equal protection was violated because Plaintiff was denied an "on-street parking permit" for a specified location in the Town on the ground that Plaintiff was not a resident at the location involved.The Appellate Division said that the Town had established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and that Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition.With respect to Plaintiff's… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record supported the… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The appointing authority adopted the hearing officer's findings and recommendation and terminated Thomas' employment, whereupon Thomas filed a petition pursuant Article 78 of the CPLR seeking a judicial review of the Town's action.The Appellate Division dismissed Thomas' appeal, explaining that any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer (see Matter of Reed v Raynor, 151 AD3d 730), and substantial evidence in the record supported the… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
According to a press release by ClimateEarth, the appellants are calling on the Court to order the government to produce a new plan which will deliver urgent cuts to the illegal levels of air pollution in towns and cities. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Mid Vermont Christian School v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the New York Court of Appeals-- the state's highest court-- heard oral arguments in Matter of Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc. v McCoy. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Voters with Facts v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:56 am
Given the evidence presented, the jury was completely right in saying that the State did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
