Search for: "UP-039 - State v. Day"
Results 681 - 700
of 10,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
§292 requires courts to impose up to a $500.00 penalty for false marking on a per article basis. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
It's an important case. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:09 am
Which way next for Nokia v Daimler? [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:18 pm
Clevenger v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
Or, perhaps, he comes up with two quite different solutions. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:03 am
This requires a little background: In 1992, Allstate, evidently tired of its "You're in good hands" image, decided it needed to toughen up. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
’ State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:19 pm
Moreover, as a practical matter, at the end of the day, I think it very likely that state court judges don't have much to worry about from this one, since there's footnote 11 as well as -- in my mind -- a strong likelihood that, if nothing else, the Legislature will step in to clean this problem up and make sure that judges get their benefits.Still. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:44 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:32 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Kimbrough v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 6:27 am
In Chomos v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
EFF's NSA Spying Cases First, some history: EFF filed Jewel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
" The court of appeals' interpretation is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's 1971 holding in Rewis v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Med Ctr. of Queens v State Farm Auto Ins. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 12:05 pm
More than six months ago, the Mannheim Regional Court's press office informed me of four Nokia v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:42 am
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
