Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 681 - 700 of 51,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2009, 11:31 am
The best way to reflect what an opinion says is often to use its own words. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:36 am
Regina (Buglife - The Invertebrate Conservation Trust) v Thurrock Thames Gateway Development Corpn; WLR (D) 59 “In considering the tension between the purposes of s136 of the Local Government Planning and Land Act 1980 (bringing land into effective use) and s40 of the Natural Environment Act 2000 (conserving biodiversity) a benevolent construction should be given to planning decisions and, where a claimant contended that a decision was procedurally flawed, it was… [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Joseph Peacock
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
The ECtHR was further satisfied with the fact that the identification of data subjects on the tax authority’s website was possible for no longer than was necessary for the given purposes of the publication, since the personal data was removed once the person concerned had paid their taxes (§57). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:44 am by Eleonora Rosati
Under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:04 am by Corynne McSherry
  Related Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceNo Downtime for Free SpeechRelated Cases: Dhillon v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:33 pm
Pharmaceutical Resources and Par Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by JB
Does Judge Tauro's reasoning commit us to that position? [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:20 am
The court used a federal court and two Alabama court decisions (BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]