Search for: "US v. Powers"
Results 681 - 700
of 37,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 am
In Lambert v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:16 am
Matter of City of New York v Yonkers Indus. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:12 pm
In Kuleana Ku‘ikahi, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:05 am
The complaint in QSGI Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Moreover, the causes of action under the ATS, the Supreme Court’s 2004 language in Sosa v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 7:07 am
The October 29, 2018 decision in Halton v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:14 pm
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the case of HEAL Utah v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
On Monday, lawyers for NML and Argentina (with a cameo by lawyers for the US Department of Justice) were before the Supreme Court arguing about the scope of a US court's power to order discovery in aid of execution. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
The test of Helvering v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
V Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 241 (1984)). [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:01 am
Instead, justices would use certiorari to review what they wanted to when they wanted to. [* * *] So, it turns out the Court's power to preselect questions is not justified by history, text, or congressional intent. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:00 pm
College Savings Bank v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 11:35 am
See TiVo v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
The ruling in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 7:13 am
Supreme Court had occasion to recognize the lack of a vesting power in IEEPA, including in Dames and Moore v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
In Griggs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:52 pm
As explained by the Appeals Court, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NiMo) commenced this action to recover costs pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) from the defendants for cleanup of properties previously owned by NiMo and once either owned, leased, or used by the defendants. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:15 am
The justices have now considered 303 Creative v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
The Court, in Omar v. [read post]
