Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
United States, which asks when a defendant must have formed the intent required to commit burglary for purposes of a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:05 pm
As amended, TSCA now reads: “(v) any article the sale of which is subject to the tax imposed by section 4181 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 4181] (determined without regard to any exemptions from such tax provided by section 4182 or 4221 or any other provision of such Code), and any component of such an article (limited to shot shells, cartridges, and components of shot shells and cartridges)”. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:12 am
The United States Supreme Court in Chaidez rejected the reasoning of the SJC in Clarke and found that Padilla only applied to prospectively. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:42 am
Great American E&S Insurance Company, No. 21-55590, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and was reported by Law 360. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 2:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
The Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies the Standard for Terminating Consensual Guardianships of Minors
9 Oct 2016, 9:35 am
Some of the complexity arises because of a 2000 case from the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with grandparent visitation. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
During the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Bilski v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:03 pm
See Barnes v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm
A more significant free speech victory for Big Pharma was delivered by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
As held in Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1: …The suffering which flows from naturally occurring illness, physical or mental, may be covered by Article 3, where it is, or risks being, exacerbated by treatment, whether flowing from conditions of detention, expulsion or other measures, for which the authorities can be held responsible. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 8:13 am
Thursday’s ruling means that mifepristone will continue to remain widely available in the United States, where it is used in over 60% of abortions by health care providers. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:40 am
Back in November I discussed the case Farah v. [read post]
