Search for: "United States v. Bell" Results 681 - 700 of 1,499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
One permit was for the San Fernando spineflower, and the other permit was a multispecies permit for the western yellow-billed cuckoo, the southwestern willow flycatcher and the least Bell’s vireo, combined. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
(within 3 years) A: Letty Lynton and 2025. ____ Q: In Effects Associates v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:33 am by Dave
Comment period is closing (as of February 15, 2014) on the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure from the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
In the 2012 opinion, the judge explained that FISA is a limited waiver of sovereign immunity, and it permits civil actions to be brought against the United States for willful violations of the Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 am by Jarod Bona
Antitrust law, after all, protects competition and, as the Supreme Court pointed out in Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]