Search for: "United States v. Chang" Results 681 - 700 of 19,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm by Justin Keith
Although the Board is free to change its interpretation and application of its prior decisions, it cannot do so without explaining why the prior precedent should no longer be applied, as the United States Court of Appeals for the  D.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Sherica Celine
Are you interested in learning about immigration-related requirements, limitations, and strategies for business travelers to the United States? [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the view of the United States, if those changes are enacted, the petition should be granted, the judgment vacated, and the case remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-877Issue: Whether a district court may consider the 2018 amendment to the sentences mandated by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm by Stephen Griffin
”  I respectfully suggest this argument did not survive the 2013 publication of James Oakes’s magisterial history Freedom National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:49 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
United States Attorney General Eric Holder has announced policy changes in the wake of the landmark Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:19 am
DOJ resisted in McCane, but filed its own from United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:53 am
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey may change that trend. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
 In Urquieta v Bowe, --- F.4th ----, 2024 WL 4630284 (United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 2024) Petitioner-Appellant Maria Elena Swett Urquieta (“Swett”)1 appealed from an order of the United States District Court denying her petition for repatriation to Chile of her minor son S.B.S. from the United States, where S.B.S. was wrongfully retained by his father, Respondent-Appellee John Francis Bowe. [read post]